Out with the old… and in with the new

In March of 2000, I bought a brand-new Nissan XTerra. In the last almost-12 years, I’ve put on just over 104,000 miles, driving mainly back and forth to work. For a 12 year old vehicle, it doesn’t look too bad.

002

Back in my single-man days, I drove it on short trips into the wilds of Western Washington and Western Oregon to go hiking and a couple of times, to go kayaking.  When I bought it, I had plans to do a lot more kayaking, but I found I liked the idea of kayaking out in the wilderness by myself a lot better than I liked actually doing it.  First, since I had no place to store a kayak, I had to rent one. When I did rent one, it was hard to get it off the top of the XTerra by myself. The times I did make the effort, I was so paranoid about getting lost or caught in the tides, that I ended up staying on Lake Washington or Lake Union anyway, where I could easily rent them, right there on the water.

The grandiose plans of amphibious adventure never really came to fruition, but for the most part I enjoyed the ‘truck’. It had plenty of cargo space without being massive. The kids (when they came along) liked to ride in it because it gave them a good view from its ‘stadium’ seating. The shift-on-the-fly four wheel drive came in handy in bad weather, which around here is infrequent, but often enough that you notice the vehicles that don’t have 4WD when you do.

But the XTerra had a few negatives. First, it suffered from horrible gas… mileage. I averaged around 15.9 mpg in the city, though I once did get it up to 21-22 mpg on a trip down the Oregon Coast driving at 45 mph on Highway 101. I contemplated replacing it numerous times for the gas mileage alone. However, once I got a job in Seattle where I took the train to work daily, I only filled up once every 4 to 6 weeks and gas expenses became a reduced reason.

For a vehicle with a V-6, you’d think it would have lots of power, but it really didn’t. On a lot of hills (like I-90 Eastbound towards Snoqualmie Pass), it couldn’t hold 60 mph in high gear, and when it down-shifted, you could wath the fuel gauge fall. Down shifting in the XTerra also sounded like you were sitting behind a taxiing 737.

Still, I grew pretty attached to this truck. It was like a member of the family… one that has been with me longer than I’ve been married, and almost as long as I’ve lived in Washington State. We’ve known for a while that we were going to replace it. It was just a matter of time. It was coming up on some major maintenance needs that were going to cost more than the vehicle was worth, and though we could get a few more years out of it, twelve is not bad, and still more than double what I got out of the 1989 Chevy Cavalier and 2005 Pontiac Sunfire I had before I bought it (combined).

Today, with a little bit of a heavy (but optimistic) heart, we traded the XTerra in for a 2012 Subaru Outback 2.5 Limited.

New Car 006

We started looking around at vehicles last summer, and had narrowed it down to the Kia Sorento and the Outback, and for a while, the Kia was well in the lead. But as we started adding more ‘nice to have’ features to our vehicle needs, I realized were about to buy another kayak hauler. Well not a kayak hauler, exactly. We had talked a few times about buying a vehicle that could tow a pop-up tent trailer to take the kids camping more. Not that we have a tent trailer, or have ever taken the kids camping in the first place. But you know, we’d better buy a vehicle that could tow 3000 pounds if we wanted to. We’d need a V-6 for that, right?

Well, with the V-6, came more expensive dealer packages, and soon, what we had been budgeting for a final price, was already below the base price of the vehicles we were looking at. Yes the V-6 Sorento and the V-6 Outback could do everything we wanted, but with those models and those engines, we were suddenly looking at 18-24mpg again… for features we would likely never (or rarely) ever use. And that’s when I remembered the buyer’s remorse from buying the XTerra. So we decided to downsize our expectations, and to upsize the fuel economy.

The Outback 2.5 gives us the cargo room we need, in a 4-cylinder vehicle that should be excellent in bad weather and still allow us to live the ‘wilderness’ life should we choose. It has roof racks we can put the kids bikes on for summer trips. In a pinch, it’s capable of towing up to 2700 pounds, which should be enough for most reasonably sized tent trailers, should we eventually decide to go that route.

For the most part, this will be the around-town-car and the family-trips-car. Which means I probably won’t get to drive it a lot. I’ll take my wife’s Camry to the train station and in to Seattle when I need to. The kids like the Outback better already than the Camry because they can’t see out of the back of the Camry. I know my wife already likes it better than the XTerra. It’s a smoother ride, and isn’t so bulky.

Personally, I’m not a big fan of the Camry because I don’t fit in it very well. My head brushes the ceiling, and it’s impossible for me to wear a baseball cap while driving it. The road noise in the Camry is the worst I’ve ever experienced (apparently because we got it with “Sport Suspension”). But it does have the V-6, and that sucker moves, so driving it won’t always be a bad thing. Unless I get speeding tickets. It’s not yet 5 years old, so we expect it to last another 6-7 years.

If all goes well, we’ll have this car for at least 11 years. Then we can hand the keys over to our kids, and they can have it as their school car. Hard to believe that we’re already thinking about that. But then again, it doesn’t seem like it’s been 12 years since I bought the XTerra.

Time just keeps flying.

Posted in Pictures, Family | Tagged | Leave a comment

Unusually quiet

Yes. I’ve missed my update today, and likely won’t have one tomorrow. Fighting some kind of alien flu bug that refuses to die unless it takes me with it. I hope to return to abnormal blogging by Sunday.

Posted in Blog Errata | 1 Comment

Book Review: Starman Jones by Robert Heinlein

StarmanJonesStarman Jones by Robert Heinlein is one of those books I really wish I had read as a kid. In fact, I’m shocked that I hadn’t, and appalled that until a few years ago, I really didn’t know too much about Robert Heinlein and his place in science fiction history. I’m embarrassed to admit I’ve read very few books by Heinlein, and now, here in my early-forties, I am trying to rectify that oversight.

Max Jones is a teenage hillbilly from the Ozarks, living on a small farm with his widowed stepmother. His farm lay along the path of one of the rocket trains that left Earth, bound for orbit. He dreams of going into space like his Uncle Chester Jones, who was a renowned Astrogator – a key member of the interstellar ships that travelled between the dozens of known worlds spread throughout the galaxy. When Max’s stepmother marries a man who is intent on stealing the farm through any means necessary, Max flees and stows away on one of the starships where he not only earns his keep, he must take on more responsibility than he ever imagined.

Starman Jones was written in 1953, and is considered one of Heinlein’s juvenile series. The book is fast paced and entertaining, and still works well, though the dialogue is filled with colloquialisms from the middle of the 20th century. Were I to pick up this book with no knowledge that it had been around for nearly sixty years, it would be easy to recognize it as so. But I don’t hold that against it, nor will I criticize it for dated descriptions of computers or advanced technology. There’s just no way Heinlein could have predicted how far technology would develop in just the last fifty years, though I think he might also be a little disappointed at how far the world has come in the same time frame. Many of the things he writes about, we still don’t have. That is our loss.

Starman Jones is the kind of book I refuse to by an e-book version of because I want them on my shelves for my kids to pick up and read, over and over. Of course, they may have to wait until I’ve read it a couple more times myself. I can’t wait to give this to them to read and to see their reactions. Part of me wants to read it to them for bedtimes stories now, but I know I wouldn’t be able to get through it fast enough. Soon. Hopefully, very soon.

On a side note, I was rather startled as I read this book, because it’s plot is very close (in some places) to my book Labeled. So close in fact, that I expect that at some point down the road, I will be asked if I used this book as inspiration. I’ll say now, and for future reference, that I finished writing the first draft of Labeled in June of 2011, and didn’t even know this book existed until two weeks ago, when I bought it at a used book store. Any similarity between my book, and this, is purely coincidental, and enough of the story is different that I suspect no one will actually accuse me of stealing. I’ll go with the infinite monkeys theory of writing, and say that if you put enough monkeys in front of keyboards, one of them will eventually create on the masterpieces of history. Consider me one of those monkeys. And I’m hoping that if you liked Starman Jones, you’ll like my contribution to the genre when it is published.

Posted in Book Reviews | Tagged | 1 Comment

A Little Redecorating

I finished the import of the blog entries from my old blog today, and completed categorizing them. All of them are in the category “Cranium Outpost Import” (which you can see on the right-hand sidebar of this site), though they may be included in many other categories as well. By and large, most of them are about my family and cover the time where my wife and I were preparing for the birth of our twins, and through the first few years of their lives.

You’ll notice a pretty distinct difference between those blog entries, and the ones I create now. Back then, I was blogging mainly for my friends and family, and the entries are usually quite personal. They are also very likely to cover many different topics in a single entry, so it is hard to classify them just as “Book Reviews” or “Family”. There’s a little of everything in each entry. As blogging has changed from a communication tool for my family, to a more professional component of my writing platform, I learned that each blog entry should be a single topic. I highly recommend to new bloggers that you refrain from massive mind-dump entries, and use smaller, more targeted (and more frequent) entries. Of course, during those first few months with twins, you take time when you get it and write until the kids wake up. Learning how to schedule a post for publication is an essential skill for those of us who write in spurts.

As I said previously, I originally wasn’t going to include these entries in this site. The writing and the message aren’t in sync with what I am doing now. On CraniumOutpost, when I did stray from family updates, my opinion pieces were more rants than op-eds. The writing wasn’t very good or consistent, and as I read back through some of them this weekend, I had difficu1lty remembering exactly where I was emotionally when I wrote them. Still, they make for interesting reading in terms of showing my development as a blogger, a writer, and a father, and I wanted everything under one roof.

So feel free to tour back through the archives, all the way back to that first entry entitled “A New Beginning” where I first launched my blogging career on November 13, 2006. Some of the blogs are irrelevant now, but some are still worth reading. Let me know if you find anything broken, or anything that you want to know more about.

Posted in Blog Errata | Tagged | Leave a comment

Opportunities Abound

Last week, I got an email from a reader of my blog, asking if I would be interested in ghostwriting his memoirs. I had to read the message twice. Actually, I probably read it a dozen times before I responded. And I sat with it there in my inbox for most of the day before I typed up a reply.

Life has a funny way of throwing you a curve-ball when you least expect it, but what was really odd about this one was that I was in the middle of reading John Scalzi’s book on writing in which he stresses the importance for writers to have multiple income streams. I am not now, nor likely in the near future, in the position to be a full-time writer. Writing is a hobby into which I am very, very invested. I call it my second job – a job that pays quite poorly. Pretty-much nothing right now. In the mid 80’s I did get a $14 check for a letter I wrote to Model Railroader magazine. The check was pink. But since then, not a dime.

I’ve written a ton of fiction in the last few years, but writing a memoir is not at all like writing fiction or even writing blog entries. There’s a certain standard of honesty in a a nonfiction book that fiction writers get to completely ignore and bloggers just aren’t held to. Nonfiction requires research and quotes and liability and becoming an expert on something. When this opportunity came into my inbox, and I thought about writing a memoir, I pictured someone poring over it, examining every adjective, and questioning whether the subject really did feel morose on April 13, 1973. Or did they just feel a little sad? Perhaps they felt morose on April 14th, 1973, which may sound irrelevant, but if, on the night of April 13th, they went out and hung up all the neighborhood cats from the clothesline in the back of Aunt Gertrude’s yard, maybe that date matters. Nonfiction scares the crap out of me because I’m so used to spending the entire writing day lying to the reader (except here, of course), and in nonfiction, someone would invariably call my bluff.

But say I decided that I wanted to write nonfiction and could get past the not-being-able-to-lie thing. This opportunity would surely diversify my income stream – or it would if I were making income from fiction. I suppose there is chance I could start making money from fiction very soon, (“So you’re saying there’s a chance!”), but I’m not counting on having Lauren Holly handing me a book advance next week. Writing is writing when you need to make money. Again, income diversification.

But technically, I already have income diversification. I have a day job. It’s not writing, but it does pay the bills. But it’s work. As Scalzi also points out, writing is work too. Yes. True. And, if he ever reads the next line, he will undoubtedly roll his eyes and say ‘moron’, but… given an even trade on dollars and donuts, I’d like to think my life would be better if my donuts came from writing. Because it’s what I’ve always wanted to do. And that’s why this offer was so tempting, even if it was outside of my comfort zone.

If writing was what I always wanted to do, the how did I end up not doing exactly what I want to do for a living? Well, that’s a bit of a story. Let’s see if I can summarize and not bore the crap out of you, or terminate any chance I ever have of landing a future job in IT. Which, by the way, I’m pretty damn good at. The IT part. Not the boring the crap out of you. I hope.

I’ve always been good with computers. I started using them when I was eight, when I had my first surgery on my feet (a whole other blog entry). I was in a wheelchair for six weeks, and around that time, my school got its first Commodore PET computer. With a little help from Paul Jensen, who was the son of my favorite teacher of all time, Ruth Ann Jensen, (who was my Grade 7 teacher, and my high school creative writing teacher), I started to learn how to program. One thing led to another, and my dad bought us a Commodore 64 for Christmas in 1982. I’ve used a computer pretty much every day of my life since then. I transcribed computer programs from Compute! Gazette, saved them on cassette tapes and later on the 1541 disk drive, and made that little shade-of-tan box do amazing things. I wrote short stories on the Quick Brown Fox word processor that I plugged into the back of the CPU. I printed those stories on my MPS-801 dot matrix printer, which was a lot easier to read than my horrible penmanship. My teachers didn’t like the fact that QBF had spell check, nor did they like the raised ‘g’ from the dot matrix printer. Mrs. Jensen docked me a grade on one paper because of that raised ‘g’.

By the time high school rolled around, I was pretty good with computers. But I also knew I wasn’t the best at computers. I liked using them, and I liked that they enabled me to do other things quickly and easily. I saw their power. I saw how easy it was to put together computer programs that did things that made other things easy or saved time. But I was never a bit-head. I was horrible at electronics, and I could never remember all the part numbers that ‘real’ computer people took so seriously. To this day, I couldn’t tell you the difference between a serial port and a parallel port, except that the plugs look different. And even with modern technology, I still don’t care about the difference between an Intel chip or an ATOM processor or care about advanced features on the latest cell phones. I look at computers and technology as tools to make my job easier. When I’m writing software for a client, I look to technology to solve a client’s problem so they can work more efficiently so we can all make the money we need to make to support our families, so we can go home earlier and do the things we really want to do. Thus, computer science was a side-thought when choosing which university I would go to, and what career I thought I would pursue when I graduated.

In Ontario, when I was in high school, college applications were accepted by a central office which limited each student to apply to three schools, so that students didn’t carpet-bomb every school in the province with applications. One of the schools I applied to was Ryerson Polytechnique in Toronto, for journalism. Another was the University of Toronto for aerospace engineering. And the third was the University of Waterloo for chemical engineering. But shortly after I submitted my applications, I discovered a new program at York University for Honours Physics – Space and Communication Science. According to those pesky Ontario rules, I could only have three applications active at a time. So I dropped the journalism application right before the deadline. I was accepted at York and Waterloo, and I don’t remember about U of T (I don’t think I made it, but I could be wrong). Due to a paperwork snafu, I also got an acceptance from Ryerson for journalism. By that point however, I was fully hooked on the idea of going to study Space Science.

But why did I drop the journalism application and not the one for chemical engineering? I really had no ambition to be a chemical engineer, and journalism was much closer to my dream of writing for a living. Well, a couple of points. 1) I had done an internship at Esso Petroleum in Sarnia during high school and I had some great letters of recommendation from those engineers and scientists that virtually assured me of a place at Waterloo and probably a job when I got out, and 2) I had to get in somewhere. U of T’s entrance requirements were ridiculously high, and I knew that was aiming for the stars. York’s program was new and fascinating . I saw it as the stepping stone to NASA. I met their entrance criteria but I was not a straight A student, so I was concerned I would get shut out and not have any school to go to in the fall. I think I was the final (or second-to-last) student accepted into York’s program. It was very close. ChemEng at Waterloo was my backup plan, one which, in retrospect, would have made me miserable because I hated chemistry in college.

But there were other considerations on the journalism side. I’ve always been a very practical person. I harbored doubts about my ability to make a living as a journalist in the long run. As I recall, the ‘80s were a rough time for journalists; a couple of them were killed or kidnapped in Beirut (or in some war-torn country). Plus, I was not the healthiest kid around, and the idea of being sick or injured overseas wasn’t appealing. Journalists didn’t make a lot of money back then – nor do they now, I suppose. I wasn’t very good at learning foreign languages. My French was horrible, which was a distinct disadvantage to a journalist in Canada, and Canadian politics bored the crap out of me. So journalism seemed to make the most sense to cut from the list of my possible career and educational choices.

In the fall of 1990, I arrived at York University in Toronto, where I would stay until the spring of 1994. I somehow wiggled my way through and graduated despite having serious doubts within myself as to whether or not I understood anything that was said after, “Hi. Welcome to York.” I then got a job with EDS in Oshawa, Ontario, working on the General Motors account programming in C. Not the perfect job, but it was a job, and about that, I was happy. I viewed it as a quick stop until I found something to really do with that Physics degree beside cover up a hole in my wall. That was September 6, 1994.

I stopped looking for something else to do with that Physics degree after September 1995 when I interviewed at the University of Illinois at Champaign-Urbana for a post-grad position in their climate study lab and confused how a laser worked with a photo-multiplier. I think the guy doing the interview felt extremely sorry for me, and told me that if I seriously wanted to do physics as I career, I should probably retake my third and fourth year core physics courses. I half-heartedly tried again in 1997 to see about jobs at the University of Colorado in Boulder, but was told the same thing.

Computers it was then. Luckily, I took a lot of Comp-Sci classes at York and was pretty good at them.

So now you know why I am not a world renowned physicist, and why I’m not a journalist. I have no ambition about going back into physics. That ship has sailed, and I missed it by an AU or two.

But the journalism thing – the writing thing. That desire never really left my bones. I still wouldn’t want to travel to war-torn-anywhere, but I have toyed with the idea of doing some freelance writing for the local newspaper to get my feet wet. I’ve thought about writing for magazines, both fiction and non-fiction. But until last week, I had never thought about doing any kind of non-fiction book. That little email sent my mind spinning and a whole series of questions ran through my brain. Questions like “How serious am I about writing as an alternative to what I am doing now? What would it take for me to truly retire from IT and write full time? What level of minimum income must I have to ensure I can provide for my family? If not now, when?”

None of those questions are easy, and I didn’t get to any final answers. In the end, after conversations with both my wife and my agent, I decided that this is not the right time to take on a project of this magnitude. I have four fiction books in various stages of editing, and I’m really hoping that 2012 is the year that one (or two) of them move into the next stage. I’ve got a new novel in development. I’ve got my regular job, and this blog, and all the marketing that will go with getting a book published. I’ve got a family with two wonderful kids who are starting to be able to do fun things like go camping and go to the beach. I couldn’t lose that experience. So I said no.

But I did do a web search to see if any of the local colleges offer continuing education for journalism. Not as a full time gig. Perhaps taking a class will help me to develop a new skill that, down the road, when I can balance fiction with non-fiction, helps to diversify my income, and allows my career choices to come full circle.

I will concede that I will never be a physicist again. I still can’t tell you how a laser works, and at this point, I don’t think I really care. But I can still write, and perhaps someday soon, I’ll finally get to realize my dreams of doing it full-time.

Posted in Writing Updates | Leave a comment

History

Today, I imported all of my blog entries from my old blogging site craniumoutpost.blogspot.com. I started that blog back in 2006, and then moved around a bit as I tried new technologies back in 2009/2010. Originally, I wasn’t going to go through the trouble to do the consolidation, but I realized that a) my OCD wasn’t going to let me off that easy, b) I want one place people can go to find out about me, and c) I have no intentions of ever updating that old site going forward, so I might as well get this done.

I’m going to cycle through all the old entries and categorize them as “Cranium Outpost Import” and correct whatever issues I can with them (formatting mainly). Some are completely irrelevant at this point, but that’s to be expected, since some are going on six years old. It’s interesting to look back through them and see the changes in my blogging style and in what was going on in my life at that time.

If you find any broken links on the old entries where the categories have been set, let me know. I’ll try to fix them.

And, no, I have no intention of bringing my old technical blogs over from devscape.blogspot.com. Those just aren’t relevant to the conversation.

Posted in Blog Errata, Cranium Outpost Import | Leave a comment

Storm Damage

I wandered around the neighborhood this afternoon in the rain, and took some more pictures of yesterday’s ice storm.  We also drove though the older part of town, and trees two feet in diameter were cracked in half there. I don’t know that the pictures can even to this storm justice. It’ll be years before the city looks the same.

Storm Damage 003

Storm Damage 008

Storm Damage 017

Storm Damage 015

And a couple of artsy shots. Realize that it’s been raining (not freezing rain) for about 12 hours now and well above freezing, and we still have 3/8” of ice on everything.

Storm Damage 019

Storm Damage 020

Posted in Pictures | Tagged | Leave a comment

Death of a Tree

The ice wins.

060

Posted in Pictures | Leave a comment

The Ice Storm Cometh

Yesterday, the weather turned a little bit nasty around the Pacific Northwest. Snomageddon 2012, Part Deux. Five inches of wet snow, followed by a few hours of cold rain / sleet, then by a few hours of freezing rain and dropping temperatures. Our power went out in the middle of dinner last night, and came back on at 1:30 AM. We camped out in front of the gas fireplace to keep warm as temps dropped into the 20’s.

The damage this morning isn’t too bad yet, though one of my neighbors lost an entire row of trees along the back of their property (or will have to cut them down.)

058

Compare that with how these same trees looked a earlier this month.

006

This is what the street looks like this morning. Everything is covered in 1/4”+ of ice.

055

And our poor Japanese maple at the corner of our house. Yesterday, this tree was 12’ tall.

052

Here’s my son earning his keep yesterday.

026

And my daughter about to get into a bit of trouble with Mommy.

015

Today, I am working from home. The office is closed.

Posted in Pictures | Tagged | Leave a comment

Book Review: You’re Not Fooling Anyone When You Take Your Laptop to a Coffee Shop: Scalzi on Writing (2007) by John Scalzi

NotFoolingANyoneFor the most part, writers are solitary creatures. Unless you’re collaborating with a group of other writers, you’re probably spending long hours, either looking for inspiration, or trying to take the inspiration you have and get it down on paper, or into that laptop you lug around, and you’re doing it by yourself. You could do that just about anywhere, like in a library or in your bedroom, but writers, almost without exclusion, flock to coffee shops to write. It’s the ‘writer’ thing to do, and, as John Scalzi points out in his book You’re Not Fooling Anyone When You Take Your Laptop to a Coffee Shop: Scalzi on Writing, it’s pretty cliché. Writers go to coffee shops not because it’s a tranquil place to work (we all know it’s not), but because it a) has the kaffe which most of us writer types drink and b) because it’s a social – a sexy – thing to do, even though we likely sit there with headphones on and scowl at anyone who talks too loud or invades our space. Writers are an odd bunch. And Scalzi, in this book, is pretty good about pointing that out, while at the same time doling out advice on writing that goes well beyond the craft of the task.

In fact, You’re Not Fooling… is far more a book about the business of writing than it is about the craft. Want to learn about how to arc your plots or remove melodrama? Find a different book. But you want to know how to make money writing – what it’s really going to take? By all means, read this.

The book is a collection of blog entries written by Scalzi between 2001 and 2006 on his blog whatever.scalzi.com and was published in 2007. There are some intros to the chapters and to the blog entries to put the content into perspective, but for the most part, what he wrote in 2001 or 2002 (etc.) is there, as best I can tell. The blog entries all have something to do with writing, whether it be how he got his start, or how the publishing world works, or they discuss some kind of controversy that was brewing in the publishing world at the time. For the most part, the entries hold up well. There are a few things that are a little dated (i.e. ebooks prior to 2006 were nearly non-existent.), but even those entries are still worth reading because they talk about just how unimportant the medium is for writers. Those who get all upset because of the number of printed books they aren’t selling and don’t look at the e-market as an equivalent and viable market, are doomed to fail. Scalzi was all over that fact ten years ago, and it’s a major reason why he’s the success he is today.

If you’re a writer and you’re writing for the romance of writing (and enjoy being that misunderstood, under-appreciated, literary genius that isn’t published because, man, those idiots in the publishing house just don’t get just how much of a genius you truly are), Scalzi would like to slap you with a carp. This book isn’t for you, unless you’re in the mood to get the ass-whooping you’ve been needing. Writing, as Scalzi reminds us, is a business, and successful writers treat it as such in every way. You produce product. You refine your product. You market said product. You produce more product. If your product is good, you sell the product. Hopefully you make money doing it, and even better, hopefully, you enjoy the process as a whole, at least more than you could enjoy any other type of job you could get.

This is the second book of Scalzi’s blog entries that I have read and reviewed here, with Your Hate Mail Will Be Graded being the first. I enjoyed this one just a tad more because, as a writer, hearing the details of someone else’s writing career is inspiring. Scalzi’s blogging style is tremendously readable. His acerbic wit and immense vocabulary makes me a tad bit jealous of his skills. He makes me want to be a better writer. And frankly, reading books like Your Not Fooling… does make me a better writer, because, damn it, writing these days is so much more than just the art of the word. It’s the business of the word, and a matter of creating a platform and a strategy for your career that allows you to be the most successful writer you can be. It doesn’t mean just writing novels. If you want to be a full time writer, then diversify your income base around multiple streams: freelance, fiction, non-fiction, etc. It means building a platform where the readers and the jobs chase you, so that you’re not spending so much time chasing them. It’s a business and it must be treated so.

In a way, Your Not Fooling… is a complete rip off, because, well, Scalzi originally wrote all of these entries for free, and posted them on his blog to draw in more readers, who bought his other books because of liking these entries.  And now, a couple years later, that free material becomes another revenue stream. “Suckers!” he says as he gleefully counts his loot. Damn he’s good.

But I’m ripping him off now, too. I’m taking that advice… the advice I paid a pittance for, and I’m using it to break into the business too. I’m stealing his ideas. I’m learning from his mistakes. If you’re smart, and you’re a writer, you’ll do the same.

Posted in Book Reviews | Tagged | Leave a comment